Dangers of Using Cell Phones while Driving

Dangers of Using Cell Phones age DrivingMichael D. adolescentRationaleThe rate at which path sort elevator carnages ar reported give increased significantly especially within the 21st century. Many battalion have been involved in soliduss beca function of heedlessness and inattentiveness in the roadsteadtead as motorists. Statistics on these establishments creates the need of effective address before more(prenominal)over harm and deaths be experienced. Many aspects in life have passd recklessness relative to earphone expend by motorists. Theories relative to multitasking, movies, and ideologies devised by jail cellular telephone phone companies be among study contributors to phone go for in cars.The younker members of society bare the harm of using phones in cars beca usage of mis breeding, lack of schooling or ignorance to road safety measures. The younker are among the population virtually affected by road carnages and effects. There is need to give inform ation to the youth on the dangers of using cell phones in cars before they affiance in madcap lessons and eventually whimsical. The information to the young hoi polloi is authoritative as it would help inculcate good cultures in whimsical and organism considerate darn on roads.The significance of the dangers of using cell phones by motorist is addressing recklessness that contributes to the death of road users through unjustified ways. with addressing such an issue the importance of road safety exit be illuminated. Road carnages have been for long related to vices like drinking and the use of drugs that interfere with cognitive abilities patch on the road. This aspect will contribute an understanding of the relationship between using cell phones and using drugs while impulsive. Therefore, the presentation seeks to enable positive contribution in saving kindliness through knowledge on ways to reduce and prevent road accidents.Outline of the PresentationIntroductionThe chang es that have been experienced in the new-fangled society prompting the need for the uninterrupted use of cell phonesThe oblivious(p) nature and ignorance involving drivers of the dangers on road ways.The use of cell phone on own and other great deals livesInsurance Institute of course safety stipulates higher chances of motorist indulging car accident found on two reasons.The motorists have to divert attention to the phones interface.The motorist gets immersed in the conversation and attention is limited.According to Virginia Tech back breaker Institute and National Highway Traffic Safety.Use of hand-free phones are grave compared to hand held phones while drivingThe excuse of non holding phones while driving to rid of accidents is unjustified.Motorists that use hand-free phones while driving are 18% drawn-out when braking.This stipulates that multitasking is an inconsiderate myth while driving in major roads.Young people are mostly oblivious of the recklessness and are i nvolved in car accidents unjustifiably. coatingCell phones contribute positively and immensely to peoples lives.There is need for care to avoid unjustifiable death on the roads.IntroductionThe modern society comprises of businessmen, students, lawyers, doctors and people of different occupations. These people have to ensure that they are constantly affiliated to clients, family and other people of significance in their lives. The popularity of cell phones has ensured a constant connection and updates in the lives of such people. However, most people tend to baby in the wrong use of cell phones. This is because some people are either forgetful, oblivious or ignorant of the dangers of using cell phones while driving. The chart above stipulates how drastic accident levels are among the young people in the United States of America which have highest cell phones popularity and usage. The popularity of cell phones has contributed to a culture which is costly to the society based on the number of deaths on roads because of recklessness. Regardless of the urgency of a call, it is not justified to attribute other peoples lives at risk because of own cut and perceptions. The prohibition of using cell phones while driving is based on the imminent threats to people lives.According to the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, motorists are four times likely to get injured while driving and using their cell phones (Violanti Marshall, 1996). The high possibility of indulging in a car accident while using of cell phones is based on two factors. While dialing, most people have to look at the phone interface. This establishes a distraction from the incoming vehicles or objects, which increases the risk to crashing into an onslaught car or object. Another evident aspect that transpires in the use of cell phones is that people can be absorbed in the cell phone conversation to the extent that their thinking is impaired. This effect is similar to driving while drunk as the d river is not within prudish reasonableness to make decisions while on the road.According to the Virginia Tech dose Institute and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the use of hand-free phones is also dangerous compared to hand held phones (Rosenboom, 2006). In a study conducted in 2004, the motorists that used hands free phones have to redial approximately 40% of the time compared to the hand held phones by motorists (Rosenboom, 2006). This postulates the unjustified arguments which most people tend to convey as the excuse to use cell phones while driving. According to this research, the use of hand-free phones by motorists is more dangerous compared to the hand held phones.In the cases of near accident experiences, motorists that are on hands free phones are 18% slower in braking compared to those using hand-held phones (Lamble, et al, 1999). This statistic is similar to that of a person driving while intoxicated. These statistics support the ideology th at is formed against the conventional knowledge of multitasking. Multitasking is a simple myth which does not suffice on the dangerous roads as truth or wisdom. Talking and driving are both activities that require attention. Therefore, performing both tasks at the same time is subjecting the chief to impossibilities and endangering other road users lives. The culture has grown popular especially among the youth who make statistics as they also suffer from road carnages due to recklessness.ConclusionCell phones are vital gadgets to peoples lives especially in the 21st century where people have the need to be committed constantly. However, despite the convenience they offer, people have to consider the relative damaging attributes. In the United States, it is reported that 6.4% of all crashes are because of inattentive driving (Strayer, Et al, 2003).Driving on any road, especially highways, is a matter that should not be taken lightly. This is because many peoples lives including un aware bystanders are dependent on the attentive level of motorist. Responsibility on the roads is a matter that requires the strictest rules against offenders to avoid road carnages.Potential QuestionsQ What are the shell and most effective policies that can be implemented during cell phone usage in cars to reduce road accidents?A Yes, more statewide driver education and technology and just 2 ways to better driver safety.Q The multitasking myth is commonly associated to females, therefore, are there narrower statistics of cell phones and car accidents relative to victims sex?A There is no conclusive data to suggest that female drivers are any more likely to have an accident than males due to multitasking.Q Is the level of road accidents bushel to get higher in the coming future and if so, what is the best way of creating awareness at both national and international levels?A As the population increases in the coming decades, it is logical to say that road accidents will increase p roportionally. One possible way to create awareness is a national campaign akin to the DARE drug awareness design of the 90s.ReferencesLamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car pastime situations safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving.Accident Analysis Prevention,31(6), 617-623.Rosenbloom, T. (2006). Driving carrying into action while using cell phones an observational study.Journal of Safety Research,37(2), 207-212.Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of opthalmic attention during simulated driving.Journal of experimental psychology Applied,9(1), 23.Violanti, J. M., Marshall, J. R. (1996). Cellular phones and traffic accidents an epidemiological approach.Accident Analysis Prevention,28(2),